HEIRS OF PRAFULCHANDRA JASHWANTLAL vs THE GUJARAT REVENUE TRIBUNAL Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER( — SCA/3408/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 00. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Next hearing 20-Apr-2026

CNR: GJHC240139152026

Filing Number

SCA/5780/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

SCA/3408/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Judge

Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

Coram

Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

340-SJ - LAND LAWS - BOMBAY TENANCY AND AGRICULTURAL LANDS ACT 1948 ( 340 )

Sub-Category

1323-SJ - LAND LAWS - BOMBAY TENANCY AND AGRICULTURAL LANDS ACT 1948 - MISCESLLANEOUS MATTERS ( 1323 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Last updated 10-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEIRS OF PRAFULCHANDRA JASHWANTLAL

    Adv. VIRAL K SHAH(

  2. 2.,MR. RAJ A TRIVEDI(

  3. 3.,MR. RAJ A TRIVEDI(

  4. 4., ,MR. AADITYA R. SHAH(

  5. 5.,MR. RAJ A TRIVEDI(

  6. 6.1.

  7. 7.DEVKANYABEN PRAFULCHANDRA

    Adv. VIRAL K SHAH(

  8. 8.,MR. RAJ A TRIVEDI(

  9. 9.MR. AADITYA R. SHAH(

  10. 10.1.

  11. 11.RINKUBEN PRAFULCHANDRA

    Adv. VIRAL K SHAH(

  12. 12.,MR. RAJ A TRIVEDI(

  13. 13.MR. AADITYA R. SHAH(

  14. 14.1.

  15. 15.MEHULKUMAR PRAFULCHANDRA

    Adv. VIRAL K SHAH(

  16. 16.,MR. RAJ A TRIVEDI(

  17. 17.MR. AADITYA R. SHAH(

  18. 18.HEIRS OF SHARADCHANDRA JASHWANTLAL

    Adv. VIRAL K SHAH(

  19. 19.,MR. RAJ A TRIVEDI(

  20. 20.MR. AADITYA R. SHAH(

  21. 21.2.

  22. 22.TRUPTIBEN SHARADCHANDRA

    Adv. VIRAL K SHAH(

  23. 23.,MR. RAJ A TRIVEDI(

  24. 24.MR. AADITYA R. SHAH(

  25. 25.2.

  26. 26.SONALBEN SHARADCHANDRA

    Adv. VIRAL K SHAH(

  27. 27.,MR. RAJ A TRIVEDI(

  28. 28.MR. AADITYA R. SHAH(

  29. 29.2.

  30. 30.RUPALBEN SHARADCHANDRA

    Adv. VIRAL K SHAH(

  31. 31.,MR. RAJ A TRIVEDI(

  32. 32.MR. AADITYA R. SHAH(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE GUJARAT REVENUE TRIBUNAL Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER(

  2. 2.DY. COLLECTOR, LAND REFORMS AND APPEALS, AHMEDABAD

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(

  3. 3.MAMLATDAR AND AGRICULTURAL LAND TRIBUNAL, DASKROI

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(

  4. 4.HEIRS OF DECEASED HASHMATRAY JASHANSINGH BHAMBANI

    Adv. PARTY IN PERSON(

  5. 5.4.

  6. 6.SUKHDEV DWARKADAS BHAMBHANI

    Adv. MR KUNAL S SHAH(

  7. 7.4.

  8. 8.GOVIND DWARKADAS BHAMBANI

Case History

  1. 20-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. NanavatiView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Gujarat adjourned three consolidated Special Civil Applications (filed by Heirs of Prafulchandra Jashwantlal against the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal) to 9 April 2026. The adjournment was granted at the request of the private respondent's advocate for additional time, while the petitioners demonstrated urgency given a caveat preference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. NanavatiView PDF

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. NanavatiView PDF

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    3600-Fresh Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  10. 26-Feb-2026

    Additional Registrar (Judicial)

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SCA/3408/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Gujarat adjourned three consolidated Special Civil Applications (filed by Heirs of Prafulchandra Jashwantlal against the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal) to 9 April 2026. The adjournment was granted at the request of the private respondent's advocate for additional time, while the petitioners demonstrated urgency given a caveat preference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case