LAV BHAYABHAI CHAVDA vs THE GENERAL MANAGER (AD.), GSRTC Advocate - LEEN K DAVE( — SCA/3416/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH on 24th March 2026.
CNR: GJHC240117942026
Filing Number
SCA/4945/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
SCA/3416/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
506-SJ - SERVICE - SERVICE ( 506 )
Sub-Category
1500-SJ - SERVICE - SERVICE - APPOINTMENT ( 1500 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH
Last updated 10-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAV BHAYABHAI CHAVDA
Adv. MR HARDIK D MUCHHALA(
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE GENERAL MANAGER (AD.), GSRTC Advocate - LEEN K DAVE(
-
2.TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. DesaiView PDF
The Gujarat High Court directed GSRTC to grant provisional appointment to petitioner Lav Bhayabhai Chavda for the Driver Class-III position within four months, pending verification of his caste certificate by the Scrutiny Committee. The court clarified that if the certificate is found genuine, he will receive seniority and benefits from the date juniors were appointed; if found fraudulent, his appointment will be terminated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
529-For Admission
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
-
12-Mar-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai
-
19-Feb-2026
Additional Registrar (Judicial)
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/3416/2026
The Gujarat High Court directed GSRTC to grant provisional appointment to petitioner Lav Bhayabhai Chavda for the Driver Class-III position within four months, pending verification of his caste certificate by the Scrutiny Committee. The court clarified that if the certificate is found genuine, he will receive seniority and benefits from the date juniors were appointed; if found fraudulent, his appointment will be terminated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts