SATYAM ENTERPRISE THRU PARTNER MANSUKHBHAI HEMANTBHAI BHALALA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER/PP( — SCA/3134/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 00. Disposed: --DISPOSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GJHC240090242022

Filing Number

SCA/4319/2022

Filing Date

07-Feb-2022

Registration No

SCA/3134/2022

Registration Date

08-Feb-2022

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Hemant M. Prachchhak

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Hemant M. Prachchhak

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

375-SJ - NON-SERVICE - ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 ( 375 )

Sub-Category

1389-SJ - NON-SERVICE - ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 - DISPUTE WITH RESPECT TO ELECTRICITY BILL BY SUBSEQUENT PURCHASER OF THE PREMISES / FACTORY ( 1389 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Last updated 10-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATYAM ENTERPRISE THRU PARTNER MANSUKHBHAI HEMANTBHAI BHALALA

    Adv. MR. KALRAV R PATEL(

  2. 2.,MS. NILI K PATEL(

  3. 3.,MS. NILI K PATEL(

  4. 4., ,MS. NILI K PATEL(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER/PP(

  2. 2., ,DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(

  3. 3.PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD.

    Adv. MR RITURAJ M MEENA(

  4. 4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P G V C L

    Adv. MR RITURAJ M MEENA(

  5. 5.DEPUTY ENGINEER, P G V C L

    Adv. MR RITURAJ M MEENA(

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Honourable The Chief Justice Ms. Justice Sonia Gokani,honourable Mr. Justice Hemant M. PrachchhakView PDF

    The Gujarat High Court disposed of Special Civil Application No. 3134/2022 filed by Satyam Enterprise as infructuous, based on the petitioner's counsel's submission that the petition had become infructuous. The court expressly clarified that it did not examine the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee

  4. 20-Jan-2026

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. Mehta

  5. 09-Sep-2025

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Niral R. Mehta

  6. 13-Jun-2025

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee

  7. 28-Mar-2025

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee

  8. 03-Feb-2025

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee

  9. 10-Dec-2024

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Sangeeta K. Vishen

  10. 24-Sep-2024

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Sangeeta K. Vishen

  11. 20-Aug-2024

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Sangeeta K. Vishen

  12. 05-Jul-2024

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  13. 03-May-2024

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  14. 23-Feb-2024

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  15. 23-Feb-2024

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  16. 08-Dec-2023

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  17. 10-Oct-2023

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  18. 01-Sep-2023

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  19. 17-Jul-2023

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  20. 20-Apr-2023

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Sangeeta K. Vishen

  21. 28-Feb-2023

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Biren Vaishnav

  22. 28-Feb-2023

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Biren Vaishnav

  23. 11-Jan-2023

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Biren Vaishnav

  24. 21-Nov-2022

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai

  25. 22-Sep-2022

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai

  26. 20-Sep-2022

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. DesaiView PDF

  27. 20-Sep-2022

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice Nirzar S. Desai

  28. 13-Sep-2022

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia

  29. 18-Aug-2022

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. SupehiaView PDF

  30. 18-Aug-2022

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia

  31. 02-Aug-2022

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. SupehiaView PDF

  32. 02-Aug-2022

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia

  33. 11-Jul-2022

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia

  34. 23-Jun-2022

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  35. 20-Apr-2022

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  36. 11-Apr-2022

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  37. 06-Apr-2022

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  38. 30-Mar-2022

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  39. 07-Mar-2022

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  40. 28-Feb-2022

    192-Notice & Adjourned Matters

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

  41. 14-Feb-2022

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. NanavatiView PDF

  42. 14-Feb-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 07-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. SCA/3134/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court disposed of Special Civil Application No. 3134/2022 filed by Satyam Enterprise as infructuous, based on the petitioner's counsel's submission that the petition had become infructuous. The court expressly clarified that it did not examine the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case