BHAVESHBHAI PURANSING RAJPUT vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.A/303/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(2). Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GJHC240077092026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CR.A/4550/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
CR.A/303/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI
Coram
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI
Bench Type
DIVISION
Category
8444 - DB – APPEAL – AGAINST CONVICTION ( 8444 )
Sub-Category
1-DB – APPEAL – AGAINST CONVICTION – BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 – IN JAIL ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHAVESHBHAI PURANSING RAJPUT
Adv. MR PATHIK M ACHARYA(
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(
XYZ D/O Maheshbhai Chauhan
Adv. RULE NOT RECD BACK(
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA , HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI
3600-FRESH MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-02-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
Orders
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
Summary: The High Court of Gujarat disposed of the Criminal Misc. Application (for suspension of sentence) without deciding merits. The applicant's advocate chose not to press the petition and was permitted to file a fresh petition after 2 years. The appellant was also granted leave to amend and join the complainant as a party respondent in the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
Summary: The High Court of Gujarat disposed of the Criminal Misc. Application (for suspension of sentence) without deciding merits. The applicant's advocate chose not to press the petition and was permitted to file a fresh petition after 2 years. The appellant was also granted leave to amend and join the complainant as a party respondent in the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts