UMESHBHAI HARISHBHAI OAD vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR( — CR.MA/2197/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: --28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GJHC240064502026

Filing Number

CR.MA/3881/2026

Filing Date

27-Jan-2026

Registration No

CR.MA/2197/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.justice P. M. Raval

Coram

Honourable Mr.justice P. M. Raval

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

900 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 ( 900 )

Sub-Category

3 - SJ - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 - BAIL - ANTICIPATORY BAIL ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Last updated 10-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMESHBHAI HARISHBHAI OAD

    Adv. MR NAUMAN S QURESHI(

  2. 2.,MR SHAKEEL A QURESHI(

  3. 3.,MR SHAKEEL A QURESHI(

  4. 4., ,MR SHAKEEL A QURESHI(

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Bhargav D. Karia,honourable Mr.justice P. M. RavalView PDF

    Summary: The Gujarat High Court rejected Umeshbhai Harishbhai Oad's anticipatory bail application in a case under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (abetment of suicide). The court found a strong prima facie case against him, noting that he made repeated promises to return ₹4.95 crore to investors in a cancelled lease agreement but refused to do so, and notably told the deceased via WhatsApp the day before suicide that "even if deceased consumes poison the amount would not be returned." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Mr.justice P. M. Raval

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Bhargav D. Karia,honourable Mr.justice P. M. RavalView PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Mr.justice P. M. Raval

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Mr.justice P. M. Raval

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Mr.justice P. M. Raval

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Mr.justice Utkarsh Thakorbhai Desai

  9. 03-Mar-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Mr.justice Utkarsh Thakorbhai Desai

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Mr.justice Utkarsh Thakorbhai Desai

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati,honourable Mr.justice Utkarsh Thakorbhai DesaiView PDF

  12. 17-Feb-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Mr.justice Utkarsh Thakorbhai Desai

  13. 16-Feb-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Mr.justice Utkarsh Thakorbhai Desai

  14. 12-Feb-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Mr.justice Utkarsh Thakorbhai Desai

  15. 11-Feb-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Mr.justice Utkarsh Thakorbhai Desai

  16. 10-Feb-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Mr.justice Utkarsh Thakorbhai Desai

  17. 09-Feb-2026

    529-For Admission

    Honourable Mr.justice Utkarsh Thakorbhai Desai

  18. 30-Jan-2026

    Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati,honourable Mr.justice Utkarsh Thakorbhai DesaiView PDF

  19. 30-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 27-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR.MA/2197/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Gujarat High Court rejected Umeshbhai Harishbhai Oad's anticipatory bail application in a case under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (abetment of suicide). The court found a strong prima facie case against him, noting that he made repeated promises to return ₹4.95 crore to investors in a cancelled lease agreement but refused to do so, and notably told the deceased via WhatsApp the day before suicide that "even if deceased consumes poison the amount would not be returned." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case