THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs UDESINH RATANSINH PARMAR Advocate - null( — FA /1204/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 54. Disposed: --26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE on 24th March 2026.
CNR: GJHC240030362026
Filing Number
FA /1134/2026
Filing Date
12-01-2026
Registration No
FA /1204/2026
Registration Date
24-03-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI
Coram
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
290-SJ - FIRST APPEAL - LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 ( 290 )
Sub-Category
1260-SJ - FIRST APPEAL - LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 - REFERENCE ACQUISITION AWARD - U/S 18 ( 1260 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
--26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, GODHRA
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROAD AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
Respondent(s)
UDESINH RATANSINH PARMAR Advocate - null(
Hearing History
Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI
3600-FRESH MATTERS
3600-FRESH MATTERS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-01-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS | |
| 24-03-2026 | 3600-FRESH MATTERS |
Orders
The Gujarat High Court dismissed the State's appeals against a lower court's land acquisition award, upholding Rs. 277 per sq. meter in additional compensation granted to claimants whose land in Jepura village was acquired for Chanpaner bypass construction. The court applied estoppel, holding that since the State had accepted identical awards in a related case (No. 513/2010), it cannot challenge the present award on the same basis, making the issue no longer open for review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Gujarat High Court dismissed the State's appeals against a lower court's land acquisition award, upholding Rs. 277 per sq. meter in additional compensation granted to claimants whose land in Jepura village was acquired for Chanpaner bypass construction. The court applied estoppel, holding that since the State had accepted identical awards in a related case (No. 513/2010), it cannot challenge the present award on the same basis, making the issue no longer open for review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts