THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs NAYAK GULABBHAI SHANABHAI Advocate - null( — FA/1201/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 54. Disposed: --26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE on 24th March 2026.
CNR: GJHC240030332026
Filing Number
FA/1131/2026
Filing Date
12-Jan-2026
Registration No
FA/1201/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice J. C. Doshi
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice J. C. Doshi
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
290-SJ - FIRST APPEAL - LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 ( 290 )
Sub-Category
1260-SJ - FIRST APPEAL - LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 - REFERENCE ACQUISITION AWARD - U/S 18 ( 1260 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
Last updated 10-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
2.SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
3.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
Respondent(s)
-
1.NAYAK GULABBHAI SHANABHAI Advocate - null(
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Ashutosh Shastri,honourable Mr. Justice J. C. DoshiView PDF
The Gujarat High Court dismissed the State's appeals challenging a land acquisition compensation award, upholding the Reference Court's grant of additional compensation of Rs. 277/- per sq meter to claimants whose land was acquired for a bypass road project. The court applied the principle of estoppel, noting the State had previously accepted a similar compensation valuation in related cases, making its present grievance untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
3600-Fresh Matters
Honourable Mr. Justice J. C. Doshi
-
23-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. FA/1201/2026
The Gujarat High Court dismissed the State's appeals challenging a land acquisition compensation award, upholding the Reference Court's grant of additional compensation of Rs. 277/- per sq meter to claimants whose land was acquired for a bypass road project. The court applied the principle of estoppel, noting the State had previously accepted a similar compensation valuation in related cases, making its present grievance untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts