THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs NAYAK GULABBHAI SHANABHAI Advocate - null( — FA /1201/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 54. Disposed: --26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE on 24th March 2026.

CNR: GJHC240030332026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

FA /1131/2026

Filing Date

12-01-2026

Registration No

FA /1201/2026

Registration Date

24-03-2026

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI

Bench Type

SINGLE

Category

290-SJ - FIRST APPEAL - LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 ( 290 )

Sub-Category

1260-SJ - FIRST APPEAL - LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 - REFERENCE ACQUISITION AWARD - U/S 18 ( 1260 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

--26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE

Acts & Sections

LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 Section 54

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(

Respondent(s)

NAYAK GULABBHAI SHANABHAI Advocate - null(

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI

23-01-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

24-03-2026

3600-FRESH MATTERS

Orders

24-03-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH SHASTRI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI

The Gujarat High Court dismissed the State's appeals challenging a land acquisition compensation award, upholding the Reference Court's grant of additional compensation of Rs. 277/- per sq meter to claimants whose land was acquired for a bypass road project. The court applied the principle of estoppel, noting the State had previously accepted a similar compensation valuation in related cases, making its present grievance untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court dismissed the State's appeals challenging a land acquisition compensation award, upholding the Reference Court's grant of additional compensation of Rs. 277/- per sq meter to claimants whose land was acquired for a bypass road project. The court applied the principle of estoppel, noting the State had previously accepted a similar compensation valuation in related cases, making its present grievance untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case