NAKUL PAL vs GOPAL SAHA — 12/2019
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: WBWM110000572019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
56/2019
Filing Date
27-05-2019
Registration No
12/2019
Registration Date
27-05-2019
Court
Civil Judge, Jr. Divn. Garbeta, Paschim Medinipur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Div
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NAKUL PAL
Adv. SIPRA ROY
Respondent(s)
GOPAL SAHA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Div
Disposed
For show cause
FOR EXPARTE HEARING
FOR EXPARTE HEARING
FOR EXPARTE HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-01-2026 | For show cause | |
| 10-11-2025 | FOR EXPARTE HEARING | |
| 01-08-2025 | FOR EXPARTE HEARING | |
| 15-05-2025 | FOR EXPARTE HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
A suit for declaration and permanent injunction may be dismissed for non-prosecution when the plaintiff fails to appear or file requisite pleadings despite repeated opportunities and explicit directions to show cause, particularly where the defendant has not admitted the claim. According to analysis available on casestatus.in, courts balance procedural fairness by providing multiple adjournments before invoking dismissal as a remedy for persistent default.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts