SI DASARATH MONDAL vs SUSANTA DULEY, S/O- LATE BABLU DULEY — 627/2023

Case under I.p.c(police) Section 420. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 07th March 2026 Date Not Updated.

Appearance Next hearing 07-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Gr Case

CNR: WBWM100011312023

Filing Number

1130/2023

Filing Date

21-Aug-2023

Registration No

627/2023

Registration Date

21-Aug-2023

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Garbeta, Paschim Medinipur

Judge

2-Jm I

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

436

Police Station

PASCHIM MEDINIPUR GARBETA

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

I.p.c(police) Section 420
Public Gambling Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SI DASARATH MONDAL

    Adv. CHINMOY KUMAR CHAKRABORTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUSANTA DULEY, S/O- LATE BABLU DULEY

  2. 2.DHANU @ DHANANJOY DOLUI, S/O- LATE HARERAM DOLUI

  3. 3.GOPAL GORAI, S/O- SAKTIPADA GORAI

  4. 4.SAHEB RUIDAS, S/O- GANESH RUIDAS

  5. 5.BISWAJIT DEY, S/O- LATE PRAVAKAR DEY

  6. 6.NANTU MUKHERJEE, S/O- LATE SUBRATA MUKHERJEE

  7. 7.NIRANJAN BAG, S/O- TIRTHANKAR BAG

  8. 8.RAJESH NANDI, S/O- PRAKASH NANDI

  9. 9.BABLU DE, S/O- LATE TARAPADA DE

Case History

  1. 07-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Jm I

  3. 27-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    Jm I

  4. 06-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    Jm I

  5. 16-May-2024

    Appearance

    Jm I

  6. 17-Feb-2024

    orderView PDF

  7. 17-Feb-2024

    Appearance

    Acjm

  8. 20-Nov-2023

    orderView PDF

  9. 20-Nov-2023

    Appearance

    Acjm

  10. 30-Sep-2023

    orderView PDF

  11. 30-Sep-2023

    Appearance

    Acjm

  12. 18-Sep-2023

    orderView PDF

  13. 18-Sep-2023

    Production

    Acjm

  14. 04-Sep-2023

    orderView PDF

  15. 04-Sep-2023

    Production

    Acjm

  16. 24-Aug-2023

    Production

    Acjm

  17. 21-Aug-2023

    orderView PDF

  18. 21-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 21-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 627/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Police remand during investigation may be granted for a limited period based on the nature and gravity of charges, subject to mandatory medical examination every 24 hours and strict adherence to Supreme Court directives against custodial harassment. According to casestatus.in's analysis, the court balanced investigative necessity against fundamental protections for accused persons in custody.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case