SI MD. KHAIRUL BARI KHAN vs DEBDUT NANDI, S/O- LATE NEMAI NANDI — 153/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),3(5)BNS. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 21st May 2026 Date Not Updated.
Gr Case
CNR: WBWM100003612025
Filing Number
361/2025
Filing Date
28-May-2025
Registration No
153/2025
Registration Date
28-May-2025
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Garbeta, Paschim Medinipur
Judge
5-Acjm
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
103
Police Station
PASCHIM MEDINIPUR GOALTORE
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SI MD. KHAIRUL BARI KHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEBDUT NANDI, S/O- LATE NEMAI NANDI
Case History
-
21-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Mar-2026
orderView PDF
Case 153/2025 Summary: The court ordered return of a seized Engine Van (Model CHANGFA ZS1100BNM, bearing no. 1549228129) to petitioner Debdut Nandi upon furnishing a Rs. 46,000 zimmanama bond. The petitioner must not dispose of or alter the vehicle, produce it as directed during trial, and prevent damage to it pending case conclusion and any appeals. The Investigating Officer was directed to photograph and videograph the vehicle for identification purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Appearance
Acjm
-
16-Mar-2026
orderView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
Acjm
-
12-Mar-2026
orderView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
For I.O Report
Acjm
-
06-Jan-2026
orderView PDF
-
06-Jan-2026
Appearance
Acjm
-
27-Oct-2025
Appearance
Acjm
-
24-Jul-2025
orderView PDF
-
24-Jul-2025
Appearance
Acjm
-
02-Jun-2025
orderView PDF
-
02-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 153/2025
Case 153/2025 Summary: The court ordered return of a seized Engine Van (Model CHANGFA ZS1100BNM, bearing no. 1549228129) to petitioner Debdut Nandi upon furnishing a Rs. 46,000 zimmanama bond. The petitioner must not dispose of or alter the vehicle, produce it as directed during trial, and prevent damage to it pending case conclusion and any appeals. The Investigating Officer was directed to photograph and videograph the vehicle for identification purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts