STATE vs ANIL PODDAR AND 03 ORS — 34/2024

Case under I.p.c(police) Section 498A,323,313,34. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Appearance Next hearing 17-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Gr Case

CNR: WBWM100000452024

Filing Number

45/2024

Filing Date

29-Jan-2024

Registration No

34/2024

Registration Date

29-Jan-2024

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Garbeta, Paschim Medinipur

Judge

5-Acjm

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

20

Police Station

PASCHIM MEDINIPUR GARBETA

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

I.p.c(police) Section 498A,323,313,34
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. CHINMOY KUMAR CHAKRABORTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANIL PODDAR AND 03 ORS

Case History

  1. 17-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    orderView PDF

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Acjm

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    orderView PDF

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Acjm

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    orderView PDF

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Acjm

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    orderView PDF

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Acjm

  10. 08-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Acjm

  11. 18-Sep-2025

    orderView PDF

  12. 18-Sep-2025

    For I.O Report

    Acjm

  13. 04-Sep-2025

    orderView PDF

  14. 04-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Acjm

  15. 04-Jul-2025

    orderView PDF

  16. 04-Jul-2025

    For I.O Report

    Acjm

  17. 03-May-2025

    orderView PDF

  18. 03-May-2025

    For I.O Report

    Acjm

  19. 19-Feb-2025

    orderView PDF

  20. 19-Feb-2025

    For I.O Report

    Acjm

  21. 13-Dec-2024

    For I.O Report

    Acjm

  22. 21-Sep-2024

    orderView PDF

  23. 21-Sep-2024

    For I.O Report

    Acjm

  24. 15-Jul-2024

    orderView PDF

  25. 15-Jul-2024

    For I.O Report

    Acjm

  26. 29-Apr-2024

    orderView PDF

  27. 29-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 29-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 34/2024

casestatus.in Summary

A person who was a minor at the time of the alleged offense, despite subsequently attaining majority, must be tried before the Juvenile Justice Board rather than the criminal court, as jurisdiction is determined by the accused's age on the date of the offense. As documented on casestatus.in's case tracking platform, the principle reflects the protective framework under the Juvenile Justice Act for minors at the time of commission of crime.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case