STATE (FOREST RANGE OFFICER, HOOGARH RANGE vs ANANTA BISUI AND ANOTHER — 1/2024
Case under Wild Life (Protection) Act Section 09,39,49,51. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th March 2026 Date Not Updated.
Misc Crl Case - Misc Criminal Case
CNR: WBWM100000352024
Filing Number
35/2024
Filing Date
20-Jan-2024
Registration No
1/2024
Registration Date
20-Jan-2024
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Garbeta, Paschim Medinipur
Judge
2-Jm I
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE (FOREST RANGE OFFICER, HOOGARH RANGE
Adv. CHINMOY KUMAR CHAKRABORTY
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANANTA BISUI AND ANOTHER
Case History
-
16-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence
Jm I
-
30-Aug-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
20-Jun-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
16-May-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
25-Feb-2025
Evidence
Jm I
-
20-Nov-2024
Appearance
Jm I
-
20-Sep-2024
orderView PDF
Case 1/2024 Summary: Cognizance was taken against accused Ananta Bisui and Soumen Das Mahanta under sections 9, 39, and 49(b) of the Wildlife Protection Act based on prima facie case established from Forest Range Officer report. The court rejected their plea for return of seized mobile phones (deemed evidentiary), allowing future application before trial court. The case was transferred to Ld. J.M. 1st Court, Garhbeta with next hearing fixed for 20.11.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Sep-2024
Appearance
Acjm
-
21-Aug-2024
orderView PDF
-
21-Aug-2024
Hearing of Petition
Acjm
-
29-Jul-2024
orderView PDF
-
29-Jul-2024
Hearing of Petition
Acjm
-
18-Jun-2024
orderView PDF
-
18-Jun-2024
For I.O Report
Acjm
-
26-Apr-2024
orderView PDF
-
26-Apr-2024
For I.O Report
Acjm
-
15-Mar-2024
orderView PDF
-
15-Mar-2024
For I.O Report
Acjm
-
22-Feb-2024
orderView PDF
-
22-Feb-2024
Appearance
Acjm
-
03-Feb-2024
Appearance
Acjm
-
20-Jan-2024
orderView PDF
-
20-Jan-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2024
Case 1/2024 Summary: Cognizance was taken against accused Ananta Bisui and Soumen Das Mahanta under sections 9, 39, and 49(b) of the Wildlife Protection Act based on prima facie case established from Forest Range Officer report. The court rejected their plea for return of seized mobile phones (deemed evidentiary), allowing future application before trial court. The case was transferred to Ld. J.M. 1st Court, Garhbeta with next hearing fixed for 20.11.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts