State of West Bengal vs DINESH MAHATA Advocate - Sujit Chakraborty — 1030/2024

Case under 7.Indian Penal Code Section 363,365. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Gr Case

CNR: WBWM070068122024

Filing Number

6812/2024

Filing Date

09-Oct-2022

Registration No

1030/2024

Registration Date

12-Dec-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhargram

Judge

4-CJM

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 14-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

7.Indian Penal Code Section 363,365

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

    Adv. Additional Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DINESH MAHATA Advocate - Sujit Chakraborty

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Jhargram acquitted accused Dinesh Mahata of charges under Sections 363/365 IPC (kidnapping and abduction), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was discharged from bail bond and released immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CJM

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    CJM

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    E/R Of W/A

    CJM

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    E/R Of W/A

    CJM

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

    CJM

  9. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    CJM

  10. 20-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    CJM

  11. 23-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    CJM

  12. 20-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 09-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1030/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Jhargram acquitted accused Dinesh Mahata of charges under Sections 363/365 IPC (kidnapping and abduction), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was discharged from bail bond and released immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case