Rudranarayan Mahata vs State of West Bengal Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 40/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBWM060002052026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

160/2026

Filing Date

17-02-2026

Registration No

40/2026

Registration Date

17-02-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Jhargram

Judge

9-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

110

Police Station

SANKRAIL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Rudranarayan Mahata

Adv. Archisman Sinha

Respondent(s)

State of West Bengal Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 9-District and Sessions Judge

24-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

19-02-2026

HEARING

17-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
FINAL ORDER

Summary: The Jhargram District & Sessions Court rejected the bail application of Rudranarayan Mahata under Section 483 BNSS in a case involving fraudulent registration of deeds using false documents. The court found overwhelming evidence against the applicant based on witness statements and case materials, and held that the statutory bail arguments were inapplicable since sufficient investigation materials had already been collected and the charge sheet was not filed in preliminary form. The bail prayer was refused considering the gravity of the offense and its impact on society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

17-02-2026
DAILY ORDER
19-02-2026
DAILY ORDER
10-03-2026
DAILY ORDER
18-03-2026
DAILY ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Jhargram District & Sessions Court rejected the bail application of Rudranarayan Mahata under Section 483 BNSS in a case involving fraudulent registration of deeds using false documents. The court found overwhelming evidence against the applicant based on witness statements and case materials, and held that the statutory bail arguments were inapplicable since sufficient investigation materials had already been collected and the charge sheet was not filed in preliminary form. The bail prayer was refused considering the gravity of the offense and its impact on society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Jhargram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case