Rudranarayan Mahata vs State of West Bengal Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 40/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBWM060002052026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
160/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
40/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Jhargram
Judge
9-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
110
Police Station
SANKRAIL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rudranarayan Mahata
Adv. Archisman Sinha
Respondent(s)
State of West Bengal Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 9-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 19-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 17-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Jhargram District & Sessions Court rejected the bail application of Rudranarayan Mahata under Section 483 BNSS in a case involving fraudulent registration of deeds using false documents. The court found overwhelming evidence against the applicant based on witness statements and case materials, and held that the statutory bail arguments were inapplicable since sufficient investigation materials had already been collected and the charge sheet was not filed in preliminary form. The bail prayer was refused considering the gravity of the offense and its impact on society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The Jhargram District & Sessions Court rejected the bail application of Rudranarayan Mahata under Section 483 BNSS in a case involving fraudulent registration of deeds using false documents. The court found overwhelming evidence against the applicant based on witness statements and case materials, and held that the statutory bail arguments were inapplicable since sufficient investigation materials had already been collected and the charge sheet was not filed in preliminary form. The bail prayer was refused considering the gravity of the offense and its impact on society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts