MANIDIPA MONDAL vs SATADAL MONDAL — 686/2024

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B. Status: Show Cause. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.

Show Cause Next hearing 04-Jul-2026

Divorce On Mutual Consent - Matri Suit Divorce Mutual Cons

CNR: WBWM010108932024

Filing Number

3370/2024

Filing Date

03-Dec-2024

Registration No

686/2024

Registration Date

03-Dec-2024

Court

District andSessions Judge, Pashchim Medinipur

Judge

1-District Judge

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANIDIPA MONDAL

    Adv. Sk. Sahidul Islam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SATADAL MONDAL

Case History

  1. 04-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    In Mat Suit No. 1407 of 2024 (R-686/2024), the District Judge of Paschim Medinipur adjourned the case on 20-04-2026 to 04-07-2026 for the petitioner to file a show cause. No substantive order was passed as both petitioners took no steps and the Regular Presiding Officer was unavailable due to administrative duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Show Cause

    District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Show Cause

    District Judge

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Show Cause

    District Judge

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 17-Jan-2026

    Show Cause

    District Judge

  10. 13-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

  11. 13-Nov-2025

    Show Cause

    District Judge

  12. 01-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

  13. 01-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    District Judge

  14. 12-Jun-2025

    OrderView PDF

  15. 12-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    District Judge

  16. 03-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 03-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 686/2024

casestatus.in Summary

In Mat Suit No. 1407 of 2024 (R-686/2024), the District Judge of Paschim Medinipur adjourned the case on 20-04-2026 to 04-07-2026 for the petitioner to file a show cause. No substantive order was passed as both petitioners took no steps and the Regular Presiding Officer was unavailable due to administrative duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case