SUMAN CHATTOPADHYAY vs SWAGATA CHAKRABORTY — 696/2025
Case under Special Marriage Act Section 25. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED EX PARTE on 29th June 2026.
Matrimonial Suit
CNR: WBWM010098222025
Filing Number
3078/2025
Filing Date
25-Sep-2025
Registration No
696/2025
Registration Date
25-Sep-2025
Court
District andSessions Judge, Pashchim Medinipur
Judge
5-ADJ III
Decision Date
29-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED EX PARTE
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUMAN CHATTOPADHYAY
Adv. Sourav Ghosh
Respondent(s)
-
1.SWAGATA CHAKRABORTY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Jun-2026
OrderView PDF
The court granted an ex parte decree of nullity under Section 25(i) of the Special Marriage Act, dissolving the marriage between Suman Chattopadhyay (husband) and Swagata Chakraborty (wife) solemnized on 07.07.2025. The husband established through unchallenged testimony that the wife refused to cohabitate due to dissatisfaction with his living conditions, and the marriage was never consummated despite repeated requests. The respondent failed to contest the proceedings after initially filing a written statement admitting non-consummation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Jun-2026
Disposed
ADJ III
-
12-Jun-2026
OrderView PDF
-
12-Jun-2026
Order
ADJ III
-
20-May-2026
OrderView PDF
-
20-May-2026
Argument / Further Argument
ADJ III
-
16-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
For Exparte hearing
ADJ III
-
24-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
Appearance
ADJ III
-
20-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
Appearance
ADJ III
-
07-Jan-2026
Appearance
District Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Appearance
District Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 696/2025
The court granted an ex parte decree of nullity under Section 25(i) of the Special Marriage Act, dissolving the marriage between Suman Chattopadhyay (husband) and Swagata Chakraborty (wife) solemnized on 07.07.2025. The husband established through unchallenged testimony that the wife refused to cohabitate due to dissatisfaction with his living conditions, and the marriage was never consummated despite repeated requests. The respondent failed to contest the proceedings after initially filing a written statement admitting non-consummation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts