JAYANTA PANJA vs SUJATA DEY PANJA Advocate - MAHAMAYA PRAMANIK — 489/2025
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.
Divorce On Mutual Consent - Matri Suit Divorce Mutual Cons
CNR: WBWM010083392025
Filing Number
2605/2025
Filing Date
19-Aug-2025
Registration No
489/2025
Registration Date
19-Aug-2025
Court
District andSessions Judge, Pashchim Medinipur
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAYANTA PANJA
Adv. PANKAJ DASH
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUJATA DEY PANJA Advocate - MAHAMAYA PRAMANIK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The District Judge of Paschim Medinipur granted a mutual consent divorce to Jayanta Panja and Sujata Dey Panja under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The parties' marriage, registered on 13.03.2015 and solemnized on 13.11.2015, was dissolved effective from the order date, finding that they had been living separately since 20.04.2022 and their coexistence was impossible. The marriage certificate was cancelled and the Marriage Officer was notified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
27-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
19-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 489/2025
The District Judge of Paschim Medinipur granted a mutual consent divorce to Jayanta Panja and Sujata Dey Panja under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The parties' marriage, registered on 13.03.2015 and solemnized on 13.11.2015, was dissolved effective from the order date, finding that they had been living separately since 20.04.2022 and their coexistence was impossible. The marriage certificate was cancelled and the Marriage Officer was notified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts