SHRABANI SINGHA GAJENDRA MAHAPATRA vs SOUVIK GHOSH AND ANOTHER. — 112/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 000. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 24th September 2026.
Misc. Appeal
CNR: WBWM010060832024
Filing Number
1782/2024
Filing Date
03-Jul-2024
Registration No
112/2024
Registration Date
03-Jul-2024
Court
District andSessions Judge, Pashchim Medinipur
Judge
1-District Judge
Last updated 02-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRABANI SINGHA GAJENDRA MAHAPATRA
Adv. KUSAL MISRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SOUVIK GHOSH AND ANOTHER.
Case History
-
24-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: Misc Appeal No. 110 of 2024 in the District Court of Paschim Medinipur was adjourned on 07-03-2026. The court deferred the hearing on the injunction petition to 24-09-2026 to allow service of fresh requisite upon Respondent No. 2 and for taking necessary steps. Both appellant and Respondent No. 1 appeared through their advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
06-Dec-2025
OrderView PDF
-
06-Dec-2025
Hearing
District Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
Hearing
District Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
OrderView PDF
-
06-Aug-2025
Hearing
District Judge
-
17-Jun-2025
OrderView PDF
-
17-Jun-2025
Hearing
District Judge
-
09-Apr-2025
OrderView PDF
-
09-Apr-2025
Hearing
District Judge
-
21-Feb-2025
OrderView PDF
-
21-Feb-2025
Hearing
District Judge
-
14-Nov-2024
OrderView PDF
-
14-Nov-2024
For Steps
District Judge
-
19-Sep-2024
OrderView PDF
-
19-Sep-2024
Hearing
District Judge
-
12-Aug-2024
OrderView PDF
-
12-Aug-2024
Hearing
District Judge
-
03-Jul-2024
OrderView PDF
-
03-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 112/2024
Summary: Misc Appeal No. 110 of 2024 in the District Court of Paschim Medinipur was adjourned on 07-03-2026. The court deferred the hearing on the injunction petition to 24-09-2026 to allow service of fresh requisite upon Respondent No. 2 and for taking necessary steps. Both appellant and Respondent No. 1 appeared through their advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts