STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs DIPENDU BHUNAI — 40/2022
Case under I.p.c(police) Section 341,323,307,354. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.
POCSO
CNR: WBWM010041262022
Filing Number
3150/2022
Filing Date
07-May-2022
Registration No
40/2022
Registration Date
07-May-2022
Court
District andSessions Judge, Pashchim Medinipur
Judge
4-ADJ II
Last updated 02-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
351
Police Station
KHARAGPUR LOCAL
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Adv. LD. SPL. P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIPENDU BHUNAI
Case History
-
18-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence
ADJ II
-
07-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
ADJ II
-
20-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
-
20-Sep-2025
Evidence
ADJ II
-
19-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
ADJ II
-
11-Jul-2025
OrderView PDF
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence
ADJ II
-
10-Jul-2025
OrderView PDF
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence
ADJ II
-
04-Feb-2025
OrderView PDF
-
04-Feb-2025
Evidence
ADJ II
-
03-Feb-2025
OrderView PDF
-
03-Feb-2025
Evidence
ADJ II
-
27-Aug-2024
OrderView PDF
-
27-Aug-2024
Evidence
ADJ II
-
01-Jul-2024
OrderView PDF
-
01-Jul-2024
Evidence
ADJ II
-
04-Apr-2024
OrderView PDF
-
04-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Victim
ADJ II
-
11-Dec-2023
OrderView PDF
-
11-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Victim
ADJ II
-
17-Aug-2023
OrderView PDF
-
17-Aug-2023
Evidence Of Victim
ADJ II
-
04-May-2023
OrderView PDF
-
04-May-2023
Evidence Of Victim
ADJ II
-
02-Feb-2023
OrderView PDF
-
02-Feb-2023
Evidence Of Victim
ADJ II
-
26-Sep-2022
OrderView PDF
-
26-Sep-2022
Evidence Of Victim
ADJ II
-
29-Aug-2022
Evidence Of Victim
ADJ II
-
29-Jun-2022
Charge / Plea Hearing
ADJ II
-
15-Jun-2022
OrderView PDF
-
15-Jun-2022
Production
ADJ II
-
01-Jun-2022
Production
ADJ II
-
21-May-2022
OrderView PDF
-
21-May-2022
Production
ADJ II
-
11-May-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-May-2022
OrderView PDF
-
07-May-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 40/2022
Under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Sections 25-26 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, a court may direct recording of the victim's and witness statements before a Magistrate when such recording is necessary for investigation and the voluntariness of such individuals is established. A detailed examination of the document available on casestatus.in reveals that courts must balance procedural requirements with practical investigative necessity when permitting extra-judicial statements in POCSO matters.
Explore other courts