MANTU NAYEK AND ANOTHER. vs TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. — 232/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 164. Status: For Sr. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.

For Sr Next hearing 04-Jul-2026 this date has passed

M A C C - M.A.C.C

CNR: WBWM010034122025

Filing Number

1086/2025

Filing Date

09-Apr-2025

Registration No

232/2025

Registration Date

09-Apr-2025

Court

District andSessions Judge, Pashchim Medinipur

Judge

3-ADJ I

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 164

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANTU NAYEK AND ANOTHER.

    Adv. SATYAJIT CHAKRABORTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

Case History

  1. 04-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    For Sr

    ADJ I

  3. 18-Nov-2025

    For Sr

    ADJ I

  4. 17-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    ADJ I

  5. 03-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    ADJ I

  6. 09-Apr-2025

    OrderView PDF

  7. 09-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 232/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Under Section 164 of the Motor Vehicles Act, a claimant seeking compensation for death in a motor vehicle accident must implead the Nodal Officer or Designated Officer of the insurance company as a proper party respondent at the location where the FIR was registered. According to casestatus.in's analysis of this judgment, courts may also grant reasonable time for payment of deficit court fees when claimants face genuine financial hardship.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case