BACCHAN KHAN alias KHA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 1170/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBWM010023992026

Filing Number

1822/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

1170/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District andSessions Judge, Pashchim Medinipur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BACCHAN KHAN alias KHA

    Adv. SAMIK BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge of Paschim Medinipur rejected the petition filed by Bacchan Khan under Section 482 BNSS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) as "not moved" because the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls on the hearing date of 04.05.2026. The statutory period for hearing had already expired, leading to dismissal of the miscellaneous case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 10-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  10. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  11. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  12. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  13. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  14. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  15. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1170/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge of Paschim Medinipur rejected the petition filed by Bacchan Khan under Section 482 BNSS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) as "not moved" because the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls on the hearing date of 04.05.2026. The statutory period for hearing had already expired, leading to dismissal of the miscellaneous case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case