MANAS TALDI alias MANAS TALDHI vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 1103/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBWM010022622026

Filing Number

1722/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

1103/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District andSessions Judge, Pashchim Medinipur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANAS TALDI alias MANAS TALDHI

    Adv. Chiranjib Bhowmik

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 1103/2026 Manas Taldi's bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. in a sexual assault case (Dantan P.S case 37/2026, charges under Sections 69/351(3) BNS) was rejected. The Sessions Judge found that the tutor accused of sexually abusing his student had exploited his position of authority, and the 183 B.N.S.S. statement and medical report corroborated the prosecution's case sufficiently to deny bail at this stage, despite the accused's 39-day custody period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1103/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1103/2026 Manas Taldi's bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. in a sexual assault case (Dantan P.S case 37/2026, charges under Sections 69/351(3) BNS) was rejected. The Sessions Judge found that the tutor accused of sexually abusing his student had exploited his position of authority, and the 183 B.N.S.S. statement and medical report corroborated the prosecution's case sufficiently to deny bail at this stage, despite the accused's 39-day custody period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case