PRASANTA PUILA AND ORS. vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 983/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBWM010020632026

Filing Number

1561/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

983/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District andSessions Judge, Pashchim Medinipur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRASANTA PUILA AND ORS.

    Adv. Subhajit singha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge of Paschim Medinipur rejected the petitioner's application under Section 482 BNSS (Criminal Procedure Code) as not moved, since no representative appeared on behalf of Prasanta Puila on the scheduled hearing date. The court found that the statutory period for hearing had expired and disposed of the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 31-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 31-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  10. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  11. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  12. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  13. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 983/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge of Paschim Medinipur rejected the petitioner's application under Section 482 BNSS (Criminal Procedure Code) as not moved, since no representative appeared on behalf of Prasanta Puila on the scheduled hearing date. The court found that the statutory period for hearing had expired and disposed of the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case