ANANYA PARIAL MUKHERJEE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 896/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th April 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBWM010019072026
Filing Number
1452/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
896/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
District andSessions Judge, Pashchim Medinipur
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANANYA PARIAL MUKHERJEE
Adv. Sumit Ghosh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 896/2026 - ANANYA PARIAL MUKHERJEE v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Ananya Parial Mukherjee in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case 634/2025 (charges under sections 318(4)/356(2) BNS). The court allowed the bail application because the petitioner had complied with notice requirements and the prosecution raised no objection or specific grounds for detention. Bail was set at Rs. 3,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to standard conditions under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 896/2026
Case 896/2026 - ANANYA PARIAL MUKHERJEE v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Ananya Parial Mukherjee in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case 634/2025 (charges under sections 318(4)/356(2) BNS). The court allowed the bail application because the petitioner had complied with notice requirements and the prosecution raised no objection or specific grounds for detention. Bail was set at Rs. 3,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to standard conditions under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts