GOPAL KHATUYA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 498/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 19th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBWM010010742026
Filing Number
818/2026
Filing Date
31-Jan-2026
Registration No
498/2026
Registration Date
31-Jan-2026
Court
District andSessions Judge, Pashchim Medinipur
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 02-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOPAL KHATUYA
Adv. Bhubaneswar Kuila
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Sessions Judge of Paschim Medinipur rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Gopal Khatuya under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in a domestic violence case (Debra P.S. Case No.43/2026) involving charges under Sections 85/115(2)/82(1)/351(2) BNS. The court found the nature of allegations against the petitioner, who is the husband of the complainant, and the materials on record insufficient to warrant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 498/2026
The Sessions Judge of Paschim Medinipur rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Gopal Khatuya under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in a domestic violence case (Debra P.S. Case No.43/2026) involving charges under Sections 85/115(2)/82(1)/351(2) BNS. The court found the nature of allegations against the petitioner, who is the husband of the complainant, and the materials on record insufficient to warrant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts