SK MANJUR ISLAM vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 415/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBWM010008792026

Filing Number

652/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

415/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

District andSessions Judge, Pashchim Medinipur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SK MANJUR ISLAM

    Adv. SANKHA SUVRA DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge of Paschim Medinipur granted anticipatory bail to Sk. Manjur Islam in a case involving charges under BNS sections 316(2), 318(4), 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), and 3(5), finding it to be a business transaction dispute with no cheating involved. The bail was allowed with conditions including a Rs. 3,000 bail amount with one surety of equal value and a requirement to meet the investigating officer fortnightly until charge sheet submission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  10. 18-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  11. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 415/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge of Paschim Medinipur granted anticipatory bail to Sk. Manjur Islam in a case involving charges under BNS sections 316(2), 318(4), 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), and 3(5), finding it to be a business transaction dispute with no cheating involved. The bail was allowed with conditions including a Rs. 3,000 bail amount with one surety of equal value and a requirement to meet the investigating officer fortnightly until charge sheet submission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case