SK HASIBUL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 364/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBWM010007872026

Filing Number

579/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

364/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

District andSessions Judge, Pashchim Medinipur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SK HASIBUL

    Adv. SONALI MAJI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge of Paschim Medinipur granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Sk Hazibul in a case involving charges under BNS sections 85, 115(2), 117(2), 109, and 3(5). The court allowed the bail considering that the petitioner is the husband of the de facto complainant with an 11-year marriage, co-accused persons are already on bail, and the Public Prosecutor raised no objection. Bail was fixed at Rs. 3,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to arrest officer's satisfaction and standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 364/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge of Paschim Medinipur granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Sk Hazibul in a case involving charges under BNS sections 85, 115(2), 117(2), 109, and 3(5). The court allowed the bail considering that the petitioner is the husband of the de facto complainant with an 11-year marriage, co-accused persons are already on bail, and the Public Prosecutor raised no objection. Bail was fixed at Rs. 3,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to arrest officer's satisfaction and standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case