State of West Bengal vs Sohel — 114/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,307,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 27th April 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: WBUD050013302018

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1007/2018

Filing Date

09-10-2018

Registration No

114/2018

Registration Date

09-10-2018

Court

Additional District Judge, Islampore

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

27th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

290

Police Station

GOALPUKHAR

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,307,506

Petitioner(s)

State of West Bengal

Adv. A.P.P

Respondent(s)

Sohel

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADJ

27-04-2026

Disposed

17-04-2026

Judgement

10-03-2026

Judgement

23-02-2026

Judgement

21-02-2026

Judgement

Final Orders / Judgements

27-04-2026
Copy of Order
27-04-2026
Judgment

The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted accused Sohel of charges under sections 341/307 IPC, finding the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted significant contradictions in witness testimony, particularly that the de facto informant only testified to a scuffle rather than the alleged assault with a sharp weapon, and that hearsay witnesses lacked credibility without corroboration from the informant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

11-10-2018
Copy of Order
11-10-2018
Copy of Order
07-12-2018
Copy of Order
27-02-2019
Copy of Order
16-07-2019
Copy of Order
21-08-2019
Copy of Order
26-02-2021
Copy of Order
01-04-2021
Copy of Order
19-04-2021
Copy of Order
11-04-2019
Copy of Order
09-09-2025
Copy of Order
19-01-2026
Copy of Order
18-02-2026
Copy of Order
20-02-2026
Copy of Order
21-02-2026
Copy of Order
19-02-2026
Copy of Order
10-03-2026
Copy of Order
17-04-2026
Copy of Order
casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted accused Sohel of charges under sections 341/307 IPC, finding the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted significant contradictions in witness testimony, particularly that the de facto informant only testified to a scuffle rather than the alleged assault with a sharp weapon, and that hearsay witnesses lacked credibility without corroboration from the informant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District Judge, Islampore All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case