ASHIK LAKRA AND ONE OTHER vs State of West Bengal — 220/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD050005572026

Filing Number

289/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

220/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, Islampore

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

80

Police Station

CHOPRA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHIK LAKRA AND ONE OTHER

    Adv. ZAKIR HUSSAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

    The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail application filed by accused Ashik Lakra and Rahul Munda under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., which challenged the lower court's bail rejection order dated 23.02.2026 in a case under Section 103 of BNS. After reviewing case materials including the case diary, seizure list, and postmortem report, the court found the facts, circumstances, and nature of allegations insufficient to warrant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 220/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail application filed by accused Ashik Lakra and Rahul Munda under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., which challenged the lower court's bail rejection order dated 23.02.2026 in a case under Section 103 of BNS. After reviewing case materials including the case diary, seizure list, and postmortem report, the court found the facts, circumstances, and nature of allegations insufficient to warrant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case