1.Hazarat Ali 2.Gulab Alam vs State of West Bengal — 181/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD050004712026

Filing Number

242/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

181/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, Islampore

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

51

Police Station

CHAKULIA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.1.Hazarat Ali 2.Gulab Alam

    Adv. SAUMENDU MAZUMDER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

    The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Islampur rejected the bail petition filed by accused Hazrat Ali and Gulab Alam under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with Chakulia P.S. case no.51/2026 involving charges under BNS Sections 318/335/345/349 and the Essential Commodities Act. The court, after hearing both counsel and reviewing the case diary and statements, found the nature of allegations and circumstances sufficient to deny bail and upheld the earlier rejection order by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 181/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Islampur rejected the bail petition filed by accused Hazrat Ali and Gulab Alam under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with Chakulia P.S. case no.51/2026 involving charges under BNS Sections 318/335/345/349 and the Essential Commodities Act. The court, after hearing both counsel and reviewing the case diary and statements, found the nature of allegations and circumstances sufficient to deny bail and upheld the earlier rejection order by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case