1.Apurba Roy 2.Adhir Roy vs State of West Bengal — 156/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD050004162026

Filing Number

206/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

156/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, Islampore

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.1.Apurba Roy 2.Adhir Roy

    Adv. Md. Izhar Asraf

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Islampur rejected the bail petition filed by accused Apurba Roy and Adhir Roy under section 483 of BNSS in a case arising from Goalpokher P.S. case no. 37/2026 involving charges under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109(1), 103(1), 61(2)(a), and 3(5) of BNS. The court found that considering the facts, circumstances, and gravity of the offense, the accused did not merit bail enlargement and were to remain in custody since 02.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 156/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Islampur rejected the bail petition filed by accused Apurba Roy and Adhir Roy under section 483 of BNSS in a case arising from Goalpokher P.S. case no. 37/2026 involving charges under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109(1), 103(1), 61(2)(a), and 3(5) of BNS. The court found that considering the facts, circumstances, and gravity of the offense, the accused did not merit bail enlargement and were to remain in custody since 02.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case