1.Apurba Roy 2.Adhir Roy vs State of West Bengal — 156/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBUD050004162026
Filing Number
206/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
156/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
Additional District Judge, Islampore
Judge
1-ADJ
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
1.Apurba Roy 2.Adhir Roy
Adv. Md. Izhar Asraf
Respondent(s)
State of West Bengal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 25-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Islampur rejected the bail petition filed by accused Apurba Roy and Adhir Roy under section 483 of BNSS in a case arising from Goalpokher P.S. case no. 37/2026 involving charges under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109(1), 103(1), 61(2)(a), and 3(5) of BNS. The court found that considering the facts, circumstances, and gravity of the offense, the accused did not merit bail enlargement and were to remain in custody since 02.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Islampur rejected the bail petition filed by accused Apurba Roy and Adhir Roy under section 483 of BNSS in a case arising from Goalpokher P.S. case no. 37/2026 involving charges under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109(1), 103(1), 61(2)(a), and 3(5) of BNS. The court found that considering the facts, circumstances, and gravity of the offense, the accused did not merit bail enlargement and were to remain in custody since 02.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts