1.Muslima 2.Sehrun vs State of West Bengal — 145/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD050003922026

Filing Number

190/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

145/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Additional District Judge, Islampore

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.1.Muslima 2.Sehrun

    Adv. Sahid Reza

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Islampur granted bail to accused petitioners Muslima and Sehrun, allowing their bail application under Section 483 of BNSS. The court found that the accused were not named in the FIR, had been in custody since 14-12-2025, and the chargesheet was already submitted, warranting their release on bail of Rs. 5,000 each with sureties, subject to conditions against witness intimidation and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 145/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Islampur granted bail to accused petitioners Muslima and Sehrun, allowing their bail application under Section 483 of BNSS. The court found that the accused were not named in the FIR, had been in custody since 14-12-2025, and the chargesheet was already submitted, warranting their release on bail of Rs. 5,000 each with sureties, subject to conditions against witness intimidation and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case