PINKY BEGUM vs State of West Bengal — 90/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBUD050002212026
Filing Number
112/2026
Filing Date
02-Feb-2026
Registration No
90/2026
Registration Date
02-Feb-2026
Court
Additional District Judge, Islampore
Judge
1-ADJ
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 21-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1243
Police Station
ISLAMPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PINKY BEGUM
Adv. MUZAFAR ALAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of West Bengal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Islampur granted bail to accused Pinky Begum in a criminal case involving charges under BNS sections 103(1)/190/191(2)/191(3)/61(2) and Arms Act sections 27/35. The court allowed the bail petition considering that the accused was not named in the FIR, had been in custody since 15.12.2025, and the chargesheet had already been filed. Bail was fixed at Rs. 5,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2,500 each, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ
-
05-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ
-
24-Feb-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
ADJ
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
ADJ
-
10-Feb-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
ADJ
-
07-Feb-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
07-Feb-2026
Hearing
ADJ
-
02-Feb-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
02-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 90/2026
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Islampur granted bail to accused Pinky Begum in a criminal case involving charges under BNS sections 103(1)/190/191(2)/191(3)/61(2) and Arms Act sections 27/35. The court allowed the bail petition considering that the accused was not named in the FIR, had been in custody since 15.12.2025, and the chargesheet had already been filed. Bail was fixed at Rs. 5,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2,500 each, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts