Abdul Kalam and Sajenur Begum vs Sarfaraj Alam and ICICI Lombard Gen Ins Co ltd Advocate - Touhidur Rahaman — 20/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Written Statement Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M A C C - M.A.C.C

CNR: WBUD050000712025

Filing Number

27/2025

Filing Date

10-Jan-2025

Registration No

20/2025

Registration Date

10-Jan-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Islampore

Judge

4-ADJ II

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Abdul Kalam and Sajenur Begum

    Adv. MD NASTER REZA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sarfaraj Alam and ICICI Lombard Gen Ins Co ltd Advocate - Touhidur Rahaman

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Adjourned The MAC Tribunal granted the insurance company's prayer for additional time to file written statements. The case is adjourned to 15.06.2026 for filing of written statements by the opposite party (insurance company) and the vehicle owner's statement/affidavit, with the petitioner directed to serve fresh requisites on the opposite party owner in the meantime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    ADJ II

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    ADJ II

  6. 18-Dec-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ

  8. 07-Aug-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  9. 07-Aug-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ

  10. 03-May-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  11. 03-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 10-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned The MAC Tribunal granted the insurance company's prayer for additional time to file written statements. The case is adjourned to 15.06.2026 for filing of written statements by the opposite party (insurance company) and the vehicle owner's statement/affidavit, with the petitioner directed to serve fresh requisites on the opposite party owner in the meantime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case