PARBATI SARKAR vs SANJIB BARMAN — 472/2024

Case under Special Marriage Act Section 27. Status: Exparte hearing. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

Exparte hearing Next hearing 19-May-2026 this date has passed

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBUD010045252024

Filing Number

856/2024

Filing Date

24-Dec-2024

Registration No

472/2024

Registration Date

24-Dec-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

5-ADJ Ftc II

Last updated 21-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Special Marriage Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARBATI SARKAR

    Adv. MITHUN THAKUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJIB BARMAN

Case History

  1. 19-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    In the matrimonial suit Parbati Sarkar v. Sanjib Barman (Suit 472/2024), the case was adjourned for ex parte hearing to 19.05.2026. The court was lying vacant on the hearing date (09.03.2026), with the petitioner present but the respondent not appearing. The local Bar Association noted a resolution against passing adverse orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Exparte hearing

    ADJ Ftc II

  4. 19-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

  5. 19-Dec-2025

    Exparte hearing

    ADJ Ftc II

  6. 16-Sep-2025

    OrderView PDF

  7. 16-Sep-2025

    Exparte hearing

    ADJ Ftc II

  8. 28-Jul-2025

    OrderView PDF

  9. 28-Jul-2025

    Written Objection

    ADJ Ftc II

  10. 04-Jun-2025

    OrderView PDF

  11. 04-Jun-2025

    Written Objection

    ADJ Ftc II

  12. 17-Mar-2025

    OrderView PDF

  13. 17-Mar-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ Ftc II

  14. 25-Feb-2025

    OrderView PDF

  15. 25-Feb-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ Ftc II

  16. 24-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 24-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 472/2024

casestatus.in Summary

In the matrimonial suit Parbati Sarkar v. Sanjib Barman (Suit 472/2024), the case was adjourned for ex parte hearing to 19.05.2026. The court was lying vacant on the hearing date (09.03.2026), with the petitioner present but the respondent not appearing. The local Bar Association noted a resolution against passing adverse orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case