BUDHU BARMAN vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 2350/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBUD010042952024
Filing Number
3218/2024
Filing Date
05-Dec-2024
Registration No
2350/2024
Registration Date
05-Dec-2024
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 21-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BUDHU BARMAN
Adv. SUJIT SARKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Sessions Judge of Uttar Dinajpur confirmed interim bail for all seven accused persons (Budhu Barman, Paikaru Barman, Gedal Barman, Pato Barman, Fakdullu Barman, Anil Barman, and Jotish Barman) under the same terms and conditions as previously imposed. The court's decision was based on the accused's absence at the hearing and the investigating officer's reluctance to submit the case report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
06-Feb-2026
Appearence
District Judge
-
07-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
-
07-Jan-2026
Appearence
District Judge
-
20-Nov-2025
OrderView PDF
-
20-Nov-2025
Appearence
District Judge
-
20-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
-
20-Sep-2025
Appearence
District Judge
-
17-Jul-2025
OrderView PDF
-
17-Jul-2025
Appearence
District Judge
-
24-Mar-2025
OrderView PDF
-
24-Mar-2025
Appearence
District Judge
-
23-Dec-2024
OrderView PDF
-
23-Dec-2024
Appearence
District Judge
-
19-Dec-2024
OrderView PDF
-
19-Dec-2024
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
05-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 2350/2024
The Sessions Judge of Uttar Dinajpur confirmed interim bail for all seven accused persons (Budhu Barman, Paikaru Barman, Gedal Barman, Pato Barman, Fakdullu Barman, Anil Barman, and Jotish Barman) under the same terms and conditions as previously imposed. The court's decision was based on the accused's absence at the hearing and the investigating officer's reluctance to submit the case report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts