PAYEL BARMAN vs SWAPAN KUMAR SINHA — 410/2024

Case under Special Marriage Act Section 28. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBUD010038752024

Filing Number

743/2024

Filing Date

05-Nov-2024

Registration No

410/2024

Registration Date

05-Nov-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE

Last updated 03-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Special Marriage Act Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAYEL BARMAN

    Adv. GOPAL CHANDRA MAJUMDER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SWAPAN KUMAR SINHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The District Judge of Uttar Dinajpur granted a mutual consent divorce decree under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954, dissolving the marriage between Smt. Payel Barman and Shri Swapan Kumar Sinha. The court found that the 6-month cooling-off period had expired, both parties voluntarily consented without coercion, and no reconciliation was possible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 27-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

  7. 27-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge

  8. 30-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge

  9. 09-Jun-2025

    OrderView PDF

  10. 09-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge

  11. 05-Nov-2024

    OrderView PDF

  12. 05-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 05-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 410/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The District Judge of Uttar Dinajpur granted a mutual consent divorce decree under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954, dissolving the marriage between Smt. Payel Barman and Shri Swapan Kumar Sinha. The court found that the 6-month cooling-off period had expired, both parties voluntarily consented without coercion, and no reconciliation was possible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case