SUSHIL MARDI vs PURNIMA MURMU — 387/2024
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 06th March 2026.
Matrimonial Suit
CNR: WBUD010036292024
Filing Number
709/2024
Filing Date
01-Oct-2024
Registration No
387/2024
Registration Date
01-Oct-2024
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur
Judge
4-ADJ Ftc I
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Last updated 21-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUSHIL MARDI
Adv. BAPPA SARKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.PURNIMA MURMU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Additional District Judge (ADJ) at FTC-I, Raiganj dismissed the case (MAT-387/2024) for non-compliance with court's order, as the petitioner failed to file the required show cause despite repeated calls and did not request any extension of time. The court inferred from the petitioner's conduct that they had lost interest in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ Ftc I
-
19-Nov-2025
OrderView PDF
-
19-Nov-2025
Show Cause
ADJ Ftc I
-
10-Jun-2025
OrderView PDF
-
10-Jun-2025
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ Ftc I
-
18-Jan-2025
OrderView PDF
-
18-Jan-2025
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ Ftc I
-
01-Oct-2024
OrderView PDF
-
01-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 387/2024
The Additional District Judge (ADJ) at FTC-I, Raiganj dismissed the case (MAT-387/2024) for non-compliance with court's order, as the petitioner failed to file the required show cause despite repeated calls and did not request any extension of time. The court inferred from the petitioner's conduct that they had lost interest in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts