STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs MD BHOLA Advocate - Golam Kuddus — 16/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,341,332,186,353,427,506. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: WBUD010036282023

Evidence

Next Hearing

02nd June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2666/2023

Filing Date

04-11-2023

Registration No

16/2024

Registration Date

19-01-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

FIR Details

FIR Number

448

Police Station

ITAHAR

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 143,341,332,186,353,427,506
Explosive Substances Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Adv. Ld. P.P.

Respondent(s)

MD BHOLA Advocate - Golam Kuddus

MD SIDDIK

Adv. Golam Kuddus

SAMIM SK @ SAMIM HOSSAIN

Adv. Moudadi Alam

SABENUR ALI @ SEBENUR ALAM

Adv. Moudadi Alam

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge

09-03-2026

Evidence

25-11-2025

Evidence

27-08-2025

Evidence

26-08-2025

Evidence

25-08-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

22-01-2024
Order
15-03-2024
Order
17-05-2024
Order
10-12-2024
Order
25-03-2025
Order
25-08-2025
Order
26-08-2025
Order
27-08-2025
Order
25-11-2025
Order
09-03-2026
Order

Case Adjourned The Sessions Court at Uttar Dinajpur adjourned the case (Sessions-16/2024) due to absence of all four court-bailed accused persons and no witness appearance, following a local bar association resolution. The matter is scheduled for further examination of witnesses on 02.06.2026, with strict directions that accused persons must remain present and prosecution must ensure witness attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned The Sessions Court at Uttar Dinajpur adjourned the case (Sessions-16/2024) due to absence of all four court-bailed accused persons and no witness appearance, following a local bar association resolution. The matter is scheduled for further examination of witnesses on 02.06.2026, with strict directions that accused persons must remain present and prosecution must ensure witness attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case