MD ABDUL HOSSAIN vs MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. — 191/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Appearence. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
M A C C - M.A.C.C
CNR: WBUD010034622024
Filing Number
669/2024
Filing Date
18-Sep-2024
Registration No
191/2024
Registration Date
18-Sep-2024
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur
Judge
4-ADJ Ftc I
Last updated 21-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD ABDUL HOSSAIN
Adv. HABIBUR RAHAMAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
-
2.BEAUTY BEGUM
-
3.SABNUR BEGAM
-
4.SIMRAN AZMI
Case History
-
20-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Adjourned The case (MACC-191/2024) heard at FTC-I, Raiganj on 08/09.03.2026 has been adjourned to 20.05.2026 due to a local Bar resolution regarding the 12th Bar Council of West Bengal Election, which prevented adverse orders from being passed. The petitioner failed to take any steps despite repeated calls and has been directed to take action upon the opposite party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Appearence
ADJ Ftc I
-
13-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
Appearence
District Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
-
19-Jan-2026
Issues
District Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
OrderView PDF
-
25-Nov-2025
Written Statement
District Judge
-
01-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
-
01-Sep-2025
Written Statement
District Judge
-
15-Jul-2025
OrderView PDF
-
15-Jul-2025
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
18-Jan-2025
OrderView PDF
-
18-Jan-2025
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
18-Sep-2024
OrderView PDF
-
18-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 191/2024
Case Adjourned The case (MACC-191/2024) heard at FTC-I, Raiganj on 08/09.03.2026 has been adjourned to 20.05.2026 due to a local Bar resolution regarding the 12th Bar Council of West Bengal Election, which prevented adverse orders from being passed. The petitioner failed to take any steps despite repeated calls and has been directed to take action upon the opposite party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts