STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs Mahabir Das @ Mahabir Ch. Das Advocate - SUBHAJIT DEY — 20/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 306, 34,. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: WBUD010031662022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2429/2022
Filing Date
28-09-2022
Registration No
20/2023
Registration Date
30-01-2023
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur
Judge
4-ADJ FTC I
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
763
Police Station
RAIGANJ
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Adv. Ld. P.P.
Respondent(s)
Mahabir Das @ Mahabir Ch. Das Advocate - SUBHAJIT DEY
Bani Das
Lalit Das @ Lalit Ch. Das
Raju Debsharma
Sunati Das @ Suniti Das
Bharati Debsharma
Chanchal Das
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADJ FTC I
Disposed
Argument if any id Judgement
Examination of accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-02-2026 | Argument if any id Judgement | |
| 20-01-2026 | Examination of accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C | |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 05-07-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Raiganj acquitted all seven accused persons (Mahabir Das, Bani Das, Lalit Das, Raju Debsharma, Sunati Das, Bharati Debsharma, and Chanchal Das) of charges under Section 306/34 IPC for abetting the suicide of Mithun Debsharma. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish any oral evidence supporting the allegations in the FIR, as most witnesses turned hostile and provided no details about abetment, resulting in insufficient proof of the required ingredients of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Raiganj acquitted all seven accused persons (Mahabir Das, Bani Das, Lalit Das, Raju Debsharma, Sunati Das, Bharati Debsharma, and Chanchal Das) of charges under Section 306/34 IPC for abetting the suicide of Mithun Debsharma. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish any oral evidence supporting the allegations in the FIR, as most witnesses turned hostile and provided no details about abetment, resulting in insufficient proof of the required ingredients of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts