STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs Mahabir Das @ Mahabir Ch. Das Advocate - SUBHAJIT DEY — 20/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 306, 34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Sessions Case

CNR: WBUD010031662022

Filing Number

2429/2022

Filing Date

28-Sep-2022

Registration No

20/2023

Registration Date

30-Jan-2023

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

4-ADJ Ftc I

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 03-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

763

Police Station

RAIGANJ

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 306, 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. Ld. P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mahabir Das @ Mahabir Ch. Das Advocate - SUBHAJIT DEY

  2. 2.Bani Das

  3. 3.Lalit Das @ Lalit Ch. Das

  4. 4.Raju Debsharma

  5. 5.Sunati Das @ Suniti Das

  6. 6.Bharati Debsharma

  7. 7.Chanchal Das

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Raiganj acquitted all seven accused persons (Mahabir Das, Bani Das, Lalit Das, Raju Debsharma, Sunati Das, Bharati Debsharma, and Chanchal Das) of charges under Section 306/34 IPC for abetting the suicide of Mithun Debsharma. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish any oral evidence supporting the allegations in the FIR, as most witnesses turned hostile and provided no details about abetment, resulting in insufficient proof of the required ingredients of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ Ftc I

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Argument if any id Judgement

    ADJ Ftc I

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    Examination of accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C

    ADJ Ftc I

  9. 19-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  10. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  11. 05-Jul-2025

    OrderView PDF

  12. 05-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  13. 04-Jul-2025

    OrderView PDF

  14. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  15. 04-Jan-2025

    OrderView PDF

  16. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  17. 03-Jan-2025

    OrderView PDF

  18. 03-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  19. 23-Aug-2024

    OrderView PDF

  20. 23-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  21. 22-Aug-2024

    OrderView PDF

  22. 22-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  23. 21-Aug-2024

    OrderView PDF

  24. 21-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  25. 30-Apr-2024

    OrderView PDF

  26. 30-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  27. 29-Apr-2024

    OrderView PDF

  28. 29-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  29. 26-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  30. 19-Dec-2023

    OrderView PDF

  31. 19-Dec-2023

    OrderView PDF

  32. 19-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  33. 08-Aug-2023

    OrderView PDF

  34. 08-Aug-2023

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ Ftc I

  35. 19-May-2023

    OrderView PDF

  36. 19-May-2023

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ Ftc I

  37. 06-Mar-2023

    OrderView PDF

  38. 06-Mar-2023

    Appearence

    ADJ Ftc I

  39. 01-Feb-2023

    OrderView PDF

  40. 01-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 28-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Raiganj acquitted all seven accused persons (Mahabir Das, Bani Das, Lalit Das, Raju Debsharma, Sunati Das, Bharati Debsharma, and Chanchal Das) of charges under Section 306/34 IPC for abetting the suicide of Mithun Debsharma. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish any oral evidence supporting the allegations in the FIR, as most witnesses turned hostile and provided no details about abetment, resulting in insufficient proof of the required ingredients of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case