STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs Amulya Barman — 183/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 109(1), 118(2), 351(2). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 23rd March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: WBUD010026472025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2096/2025
Filing Date
28-07-2025
Registration No
183/2025
Registration Date
28-07-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur
Judge
4-ADJ FTC I
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Respondent(s)
Amulya Barman
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADJ FTC I
Disposed
Argument if any id Judgement
Examination of accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C
Examination of accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C
Production
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument if any id Judgement | |
| 24-02-2026 | Examination of accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C | |
| 04-02-2026 | Examination of accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C | |
| 07-01-2026 | Production |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY: The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Raiganj acquitted accused Amulya Barman of charges under Section 109(1)/118(2) BNS (attempted murder and grievous hurt). The court found that prosecution witnesses, including the victim herself, testified that the victim fell during a quarrel with the accused rather than being assaulted, contradicting the written complaint's assault allegation. Since the core allegation of assault was not proven and no weapon was seized, both charges failed to meet the beyond-reasonable-doubt standard, and the accused was discharged from bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Raiganj acquitted accused Amulya Barman of charges under Section 109(1)/118(2) BNS (attempted murder and grievous hurt). The court found that prosecution witnesses, including the victim herself, testified that the victim fell during a quarrel with the accused rather than being assaulted, contradicting the written complaint's assault allegation. Since the core allegation of assault was not proven and no weapon was seized, both charges failed to meet the beyond-reasonable-doubt standard, and the accused was discharged from bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts