UJJAL MITRA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 436/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD010008262026

Filing Number

635/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

436/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

433

Police Station

GOALPUKHAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UJJAL MITRA

    Adv. BIJAY ROY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Ujjal Mitra v. State of West Bengal (436/2026) The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Ujjal Mitra under Section 482 of B.N.S.S in a cheating case where he allegedly defrauded the victim by promising foreign employment without arranging it. The court found that while monetary transactions between parties were evident, custodial detention was unnecessary as investigation had progressed adequately. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with one surety of equal amount, conditioned on cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 436/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ujjal Mitra v. State of West Bengal (436/2026) The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Ujjal Mitra under Section 482 of B.N.S.S in a cheating case where he allegedly defrauded the victim by promising foreign employment without arranging it. The court found that while monetary transactions between parties were evident, custodial detention was unnecessary as investigation had progressed adequately. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with one surety of equal amount, conditioned on cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case