MAJHARUL ISLAM vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 434/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD010008242026

Filing Number

633/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

434/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

198

Police Station

CHOPRA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAJHARUL ISLAM

    Adv. Arshad Ali

  2. 2.MD GOLAM SARWAR

  3. 3.SAYED ABU MD SAHID REJA

  4. 4.SAIFUL ALAM

  5. 5.ZILLE REZA

  6. 6.SHAHADAB NURI AND 05 OTHERS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the 11 petitioners in a land dispute case where they were accused of unlawfully assembling and assaulting the complainant's son. The court found that allegations lacked specificity against individual accused, the victim's injuries were simple in nature, and custodial detention was unnecessary for investigation. Petitioners were released on bail bonds of Rs. 6,000 each with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 434/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the 11 petitioners in a land dispute case where they were accused of unlawfully assembling and assaulting the complainant's son. The court found that allegations lacked specificity against individual accused, the victim's injuries were simple in nature, and custodial detention was unnecessary for investigation. Petitioners were released on bail bonds of Rs. 6,000 each with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case