MAJARUL HAQUE @ MOJERUL HOQUE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 410/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBUD010007822026
Filing Number
597/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
410/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
62
Police Station
CHOPRA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAJARUL HAQUE @ MOJERUL HOQUE
Adv. PRATAP KAR
-
2.MANUDA KHATUN @ AMUTA KHATUN
-
3.OHIRAN NESHA @ AHIRAN NSA
-
4.SAMIRUL HAQUE @ SAMIRUL ISLAM
-
5.SIDDIK @ SIDDIQUE ALI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 410/2026 The Sessions Judge at Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to all five petitioners in connection with assault and attempted murder charges (Chopra P.S. Case 62/2026). The court found that the investigating officer's delayed attempt to collect injury reports (over one month after the incident) demonstrated reluctance in investigation, making the petitioners' custody unnecessary. Each petitioner was released on bail bonds of Rs. 5,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 410/2026
Case Summary: 410/2026 The Sessions Judge at Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to all five petitioners in connection with assault and attempted murder charges (Chopra P.S. Case 62/2026). The court found that the investigating officer's delayed attempt to collect injury reports (over one month after the incident) demonstrated reluctance in investigation, making the petitioners' custody unnecessary. Each petitioner was released on bail bonds of Rs. 5,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts