CHAINUDDIN vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 367/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBUD010007152026
Filing Number
544/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
367/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 03-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
179
Police Station
ISLAMPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHAINUDDIN
Adv. PRATAP KAR
-
2.KHAJIMUDDIN
-
3.DAMIJUDDIN
-
4.HAMID ALAM @ MD HAMID ALAM
-
5.KASIMUL @ KASIMUL HAQUE
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Sessions Judge, Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners (Chainuddin, Khajimuddin, Damijuddin, Hamid Alam, and Kasimul Haque) in an assault case, finding insufficient material to attract Section 109 B.N.S and determining that custodial detention was unnecessary for investigation. Each petitioner was released on bail bond of Rs. 8,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to compliance with bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 367/2026
Summary: The Sessions Judge, Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners (Chainuddin, Khajimuddin, Damijuddin, Hamid Alam, and Kasimul Haque) in an assault case, finding insufficient material to attract Section 109 B.N.S and determining that custodial detention was unnecessary for investigation. Each petitioner was released on bail bond of Rs. 8,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to compliance with bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts