KAMAL BARMAN vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 365/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD010007132026

Filing Number

542/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

365/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

115

Police Station

KALIYAGANJ

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMAL BARMAN

    Adv. Amrito SArkar

  2. 2.FULKANTA DEBSARMA

  3. 3.DIPENDRA MANDAL @ NAKU MANDAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge at Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Kamal Barman, Fulkanta Debsarma, and Dipendra Mandal) in a mob violence case related to obstructing police duties. The court held that pending arrest warrant and writ petition should not bar anticipatory bail when investigation is complete and offences are magistrate-triable. The accused were released on Rs. 5,000 bail each with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 365/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge at Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Kamal Barman, Fulkanta Debsarma, and Dipendra Mandal) in a mob violence case related to obstructing police duties. The court held that pending arrest warrant and writ petition should not bar anticipatory bail when investigation is complete and offences are magistrate-triable. The accused were released on Rs. 5,000 bail each with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case