JIYAUL HAQUE @ JIYAUL HOQUE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 362/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD010007102026

Filing Number

539/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

362/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

71

Police Station

KARANDIGHI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JIYAUL HAQUE @ JIYAUL HOQUE

    Adv. KRISHNENDU ROY

  2. 2.NUR MD @ NOOR MD

  3. 3.BAJALU HOQUE @ BAJAUL HOQUE

  4. 4.SAHAR BANU

  5. 5.SAREJA BIBI @ SAREFA BIBI

  6. 6.RUMELA BIBI @ RUMELA KHATUN AND 05 OTHERS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to all 11 petitioners in a land dispute case involving simple assault charges. The court found that the injury sustained was simple in nature and that Section 109 B.N.S. was not applicable based on FIR material. Each accused was released on bail bonds of Rs. 5,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to compliance with bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 362/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to all 11 petitioners in a land dispute case involving simple assault charges. The court found that the injury sustained was simple in nature and that Section 109 B.N.S. was not applicable based on FIR material. Each accused was released on bail bonds of Rs. 5,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to compliance with bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case