RABIUL ISLAM vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 357/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD010007052026

Filing Number

534/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

357/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

49

Police Station

CHAKULIA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RABIUL ISLAM

    Adv. DIPA CHOUDHURY

  2. 2.FARIYAD

  3. 3.MD SHAHENSHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge at Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Rabiul Islam, Fariyad, and Md Shahenshah) in a case involving unlawful assembly, trespass, and assault, finding that custodial detention was unnecessary for investigation. The court released them on bail bonds of Rs. 5,000 each with one surety of equal amount, noting that the injuries sustained by victims were simple in nature and there was insufficient evidence to attract conspiracy charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 357/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge at Uttar Dinajpur granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Rabiul Islam, Fariyad, and Md Shahenshah) in a case involving unlawful assembly, trespass, and assault, finding that custodial detention was unnecessary for investigation. The court released them on bail bonds of Rs. 5,000 each with one surety of equal amount, noting that the injuries sustained by victims were simple in nature and there was insufficient evidence to attract conspiracy charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case