MITHUN SARKAR vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 355/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBUD010007022026

Filing Number

531/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

355/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Raignj, North Dinajpur

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

443

Police Station

KALIYAGANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MITHUN SARKAR

    Adv. SUVAJEET DEY SARKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of three accused persons (Tapas Biswas, Sushil Biswas, and Nabadweep Mandal) charged with causing grievous hurt under BNS sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(1)(2)/109/3(5). The court found that the victim sustained a serious cut injury on the neck (a vital body part) and required multiple hospital admissions, warranting continued custody at this stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 355/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of three accused persons (Tapas Biswas, Sushil Biswas, and Nabadweep Mandal) charged with causing grievous hurt under BNS sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(1)(2)/109/3(5). The court found that the victim sustained a serious cut injury on the neck (a vital body part) and required multiple hospital admissions, warranting continued custody at this stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case